Cal.com
Review · Meeting & Scheduling · Freemium
About Cal.com
Cal.com is an open-source alternative to Calendly that can be self-hosted or used as a cloud service. It offers similar scheduling features with the added benefits of data ownership and customization.
The platform includes all standard scheduling features: calendar sync, event types, team scheduling, and video integrations. Being open-source means you can modify the code, add custom features, or host it yourself for complete data control.
For organizations with privacy requirements or those wanting to avoid vendor lock-in, Cal.com provides a compelling alternative. The cloud version is competitively priced, while self-hosting is free (just pay for your own infrastructure).
Key Features
- ✓Open-source (self-hostable)
- ✓Unlimited event types (free)
- ✓Calendar and video integrations
- ✓Team scheduling
- ✓Custom workflows
- ✓API and webhooks
Pricing
Free
$0
- • Unlimited events
- • Calendar connections
- • Video integrations
- • Basic features
Teams
$15/user/mo
- • Round robin
- • Collective scheduling
- • Team features
- • Workflows
Enterprise
Custom
- • SSO
- • Advanced security
- • Custom features
- • Dedicated support
Other Meeting & Scheduling Tools
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Cal.com really free?
Yes, Cal.com offers a free cloud plan with unlimited events and core features. Self-hosting is also free—you just pay for your own server.
Is Cal.com better than Calendly?
Cal.com has a more generous free tier and is open-source. Calendly is more polished with more integrations. Choose Cal.com for value and control, Calendly for the best experience.
Can I self-host Cal.com?
Yes, Cal.com is open-source and can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure. This gives you complete data control and no monthly fees.
Quick Verdict
Open-source scheduling platform that is self-hostable and privacy-first
92/100 · Excellent
Pros
- ✓More generous free tier than Calendly
- ✓Open-source and self-hostable
- ✓Full data ownership
Cons
- ✗Smaller ecosystem than Calendly
- ✗Self-hosting requires technical skill
- ✗Fewer native integrations
Compare With